Search for: "Constantine v. Constantine"
Results 161 - 173
of 173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2011, 1:46 pm
The key decision is Walz v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Benedict Mawn v 89. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:54 am
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast, where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Finally the Court of Justice of the European Union gave judgment in Case C-314/12 UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH and Wega Filmproduktionsgesellschaft mbH, finding that an internet service provider may be ordered to block its customers’ access to a copyright-infringing website - but such an injunction and its enforcement must, however, ensure a fair balance between the fundamental rights concerned. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:31 am
Accordingly, any military action that relies solely on these “inherent” powers should be deemed to violate the Posse Comitatus Act, and should be sustained only if it falls within the president’s “conclusive and preclusive” sphere of authority (per Justice Robert Jackson’s concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:41 am
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
. SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST Episode Transcript and Show Notes: Jeff Shinder: Welcome to Antitrust Matters, a Constantine Cannon podcast where we have engaging and timely conversations about competition policy in the digital age. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
