Search for: "Consumer Law Protection LLC"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,628
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2021, 3:00 am
At the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were many questions about how best the public should protect itself. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:34 am
(Of note because it suggests a securities law crossover that Ann Lipton would probably have a lot to say about; securities law is very different from consumer protection law and standing analysis should probably differ.) [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:17 am
Protecting ideas and brand identities can be costly and time consuming for startups who need patents and trademarks most when they can afford them least. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:43 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC that an employee who reports an alleged securities violation only to his or her employer, and not to the SEC, is nevertheless covered by the anti-retaliation protections afforded by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:58 am
Our knowledge of state and federal consumer protection laws, and our experience in representing consumers ripped off by car dealers paid off: we were able to settle this case before the first court hearing, with our clients receiving a full refund of all the money they had paid to the dealer, as well as full reimbursement of all their attorney fees. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:30 pm
Recently the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) took action against two of the largest debt buyers, Encore Capital Group and Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC for using deceptive tactics to collect on old and charged off debts. [read post]
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm
This one was brought by the Consumer Protection Division in the name of The State of Texas. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 5:54 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 10:06 am
Contact the Oinonen Law Group LLC for a complete and confidential consultation. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:49 am
The LLC Law, unlike the Business Corporation Law, does not specify receiver compensation rates. [read post]
The Battle Continues After TTAB Refuses Registration for #LAW for Failure to Function as a Trademark
25 Jan 2023, 8:04 am
In re Pound Law, LLC, No. 87724338, 2022 WL 16960106 (TTAB Nov. 9, 2022). [read post]
The Battle Continues After TTAB Refuses Registration for #LAW for Failure to Function as a Trademark
25 Jan 2023, 8:04 am
In re Pound Law, LLC, No. 87724338, 2022 WL 16960106 (TTAB Nov. 9, 2022). [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 1:56 pm
appeared first on Walker & Walker Law Offices, PLLC. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 3:15 pm
Like Georgia statutory law and the common law, federal trademark law offers only limited trademark and trade name protection. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 12:02 pm
The recent decision follows a May 2013 ruling from the Federal Communications Commission in In re Dish Network, LLC, that applied an expanded view of liability for a […]The Consumer Financial Services Blog - Providing the latest in FDCPA, TCPA, FCRA and other consumer financial services laws [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:21 am
In a recent case, the Appellate Division of Superior Court of New Jersey determined that even though a homeowner may have acted as a “contractor” for his own project by retaining and managing all the other contractors, nevertheless, he still had the protections of a “homeowner” under the Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”) and Contractor’s Registration Act (“CRA”). [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:17 am
In a recent case, the Appellate Division of Superior Court of New Jersey determined that even though a homeowner may have acted as a “contractor” for his own project by retaining and managing all the other contractors, nevertheless, he still had the protections of a “homeowner” under the Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”) and Contractor’s Registration Act (“CRA”). [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 10:43 am
The Law Office of Dimitrios Kolovos, LLC filed a Complaint on behalf of a Pennsylvania woman against The Sindaco Law Firm in the federal court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:43 am
Neo@Ogilvy LLC that an employee who reports an alleged securities violation only to his or her employer, and not to the SEC, is nevertheless covered by the anti-relation protections afforded by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank”). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
While brand owners can be protected against reputational injury, the court here holds that a brand’s self-tarnishment provides its consumers no remedy. [read post]
