Search for: "Cook v. Downing" Results 161 - 180 of 1,132
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2021, 6:04 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
So you have a dog nipping at your feet, a child pulling on your sleeve, something cooking on the stove, and your phone rings in the middle of your Zoom conference call. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
         In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 5:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
         In Matter of Cook v Sierra, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 115878 (Mem), 2021 N.Y. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 1:37 am by Riana Harvey
With reference to JLR v Ineos Holdings (see IPKat analysis here), it was noted that an initial recognition figure of 32.5% was statistically significant. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 9 December 2020 Gibson DCJ handed down judgment in the case of Geyer v Ghosn [2020] NSWDC 744. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am by Chris Seaton
We were doing really well over the last three years so we hired this guy and his wife to work as a line cook and waitress. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 10:30 am by Andy Schlafly
Sanford decision and has long been dropped down the memory hole. [read post]
31 Oct 2020, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
Cook County Court Rule 13.3.1 While the litigants fill out the financial affidavit, the numbers on the financial affidavit must be based on something. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 7:50 am by James Romoser
(Ian Millhiser, Vox) Bringing Down Obamacare (Anastasia Boden & Elizabeth Slattery, Dissed podcast) Amy Coney Barrett Could Bring Down Decades of Anti-Discrimination Law (Chiraag Bains, Slate) The Supreme Court could end home equity theft this upcoming term (Christina Martin, Pacific Legal Foundation) LGBT+ youth must not be treated as second-class citizens (Currey Cook, Openly) Impertinent Questions: The Unusual Case of Gorsuch v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The early judicial opinion in Cooke and Anr v MGN Ltd and Anr [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB) suggests that in cases involving grave imputations serious harm will be so obvious that the need for evidence can be dispensed with, such as where an individual was wrongly accused of being ‘a terrorist or a paedophile’ in a national newspaper (Mr. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm by Adam Feldman
An example of such a decision was in the case Burlaka v. [read post]