Search for: "Cooper v. U.s.*"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2004, 6:19 am
v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:51 am
The case is Doe v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:45 am
Cooper Indus., Inc., 199 F.3d 1009, 1011-12 (9th Cir. 1999). [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
Allen v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:41 pm
Diaz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:26 pm
As a mutual insurance company, the defendant was “owned cooperatively by its policyholders,” LaPlant, slip op. at 1, and paid dividends to policyholders out of its profits. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 7:04 am
(in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of American Public Power Association and National Rural Electric Cooperative (in support of respondents) Docket: 08-911 Title: Kucana v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
See Duncan Parking Techs. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 7:16 am
" Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The defendants are a married couple who resided in a home owned by Joan Frank at 3 Cooper Lane in Westport. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 9:16 pm
Pregis Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am
West directed to cooperate with that. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 1:44 pm
Comm'n v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 10:04 am
“Trey” Cooper III, for appellant. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Teller v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Blake, United States District JudgeHolding: Tort claims based on conduct prior to the execution of a contract are not outside the scope of the agreed to forum selection clauses and that enforcing said clauses, which refer to “any legal action” related to the agreement.Facts: In 2013, Defendant, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (“Old Dominion”) entered into an Equipment Purchase Agreement (“Alstom Agreement”) with Defendant Alstrom Power, Inc. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:16 pm
The court's ultimate allocation of liability reasonably weighs relevant factors, including the degree of involvement each party had in disposals (both primary and secondary) on the site, the degree of care each party exhibited with respect to hazardous substances, the degree to which each party cooperated with government officials with respect to hazardous substances, and the benefit each party reaped from disposals of hazardous substances on the site. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:12 am
Deshields v. [read post]
