Search for: "Corey v. Corey" Results 161 - 180 of 371
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by Corey Brettschneider
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
Corey, 13-1148, but that involved the altogether quotidian product ethanol, which apparently was not enough to goose the Justices into action. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 6:59 am by Chip Merlin
While he has been involved in may significant cases, I think the most important case impacting the law is Egan v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 8:30 am by Paul Caron
Corey Bass (J.D. 2014, Cumberland), Comment, Taxation of Internet Transactions: Developing a Clear Rule to End State law Inconsistencies in the Aftermath of Amazon.com v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court on Monday denied certiorari in Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Corey v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm by Don Cruse
RUSSELL GORDON, No. 13-0012 decided, the Court also issued per curiam decisions in two cases involving claims brought against police officers for alleged misconduct during an arrest: DEPUTY COREY ALEXANDER AND SERGEANT JIMMIE COOK v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 9:40 am by Howard Wasserman
Adam's article, which is great, argues for an approach to stare decisis that looks to the core rule of a case, not to its result; Corey then discusses how this approach would control the use of Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:40 pm by Embajador Microjuris al Día
La licenciada Nora Vargas Acosta acotó que las personas de la comunidad LGBTT también son víctimas de la conducta abusiva que reseña el informe y urgió al comisionado a utilizar su alcance para lograr que los acuerdos pactados luego del informe se cumplan. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 9:48 am by UChicagoLaw
On Defining Ideas, Richard Epstein takes a look at the recent Ninth Circuit decision Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. [read post]