Search for: "Costello v. Costello" Results 161 - 180 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Costello, Robbing Peter to Pay paul: The Conflict of Interest Problem in Sibling Class Actions, 21 Geo. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am by Eoin Daly
In the Paperlink case, Costello J. held that the nature of the Constitution as “a political instrument as well as a legal document” means that a “purposive” rather than a literal approach is appropriate to its interpretation. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:32 am by Eoin Daly
In the Paperlink[1] case, Costello J. held that the nature of the Constitution as “a political instrument as well as a legal document” means that a “purposive” rather than a literal approach is appropriate to its interpretation, relative to statutory interpretation. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 2:36 am
Work-related stressMaine v Commissioner of Labor, 282 AD2d 854 The Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board ruled that Vivian W. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Costello, ruled that Turner did not have displacement rights over Short as Short had more permanent service in the relevant civil division -- the Town of Ulster. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Costello & Anor v MacDonald & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 930 (29 July 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Teva UK Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 2018 (Ch) (22 July 2011) Payless Cash & Carry Ltd v Patel & Ors [2011] EWHC 2112 (Ch) (29 July 2011) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:41 am by sally
MacDonald and others v Costello and another [2011] EWCA Civ 930; [2011] WLR (D) 268 “Where building work was carried out pursuant to a contract made with a company for the benefit of its shareholders and directors, they were not liable in restitution for unjust enrichment when the company failed to make payments under the contract.” WLR Daily, 29th July 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:55 am
Union activity not a shield for an employee the appointing authority decides not to retain for bona fide reasons Kunjbehari v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:38 am by Liam Thornton
In her judgment, Laffoy J. made extensive reference to the English court decisions in R (Bernard) v Enfield LBC and Anufrijeva v Southwark LBC. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:59 am by admin
Matter of Milius v Costello 2011 NY Slip Op 03856 Decided on May 3, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The Second Department affirmed the family court’s decision to award mother’s petition for custody, and to deny father’s petition for custody and permission to relocate with the child to California. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:07 am by Dennis Crouch
The increase can be seen as a consequence of the decision in eBay v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Over the last few months, we here at Abnormal Use have corresponded regularly with our friends at the Drug and Device Law blog, most notably Steve McConnell and Jim Beck, about both the law and popular culture. [read post]