Search for: "Cotter v Cotter"
Results 161 - 180
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
Well, former guest Kat Norman Siebrasse, together with University of Minnesota law professor Tom Cotter (left), are co-blogging a series of posts on Greg's article. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:57 pm
| Brussels court grants Louboutin inhibitory decision against Amazon | Planet Art v Photobox passing off: no compunction when refusing injunction | On economic analysis of IP law: an interview with professor Tom Cotter | Calls for holistic reforms to digital platforms from Australia’s competition regulator | Enterprise name vs. trade mark: throwing a straw against the wind? [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
In Banister v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am
Forest Service v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 3:54 am
The first case on the agenda is Kelly v. [read post]
30 Nov 2019, 8:55 am
"That quote is also interesting with a view to the recently-filed Intel and Apple v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
” In Kahler v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
’” In an op-ed for the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, Daniel Cotter unpacks the opinions in Ramos. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 3:59 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:13 am
(If you have read my posts on Oracle v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:26 am
Lyft Inc. and O'Connor v. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 1:11 pm
In the post-eBay v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:43 am
But whatever happened to the original litigation in Brüstle v Greenpeace? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 10:30 am
Justice Richard Arnold of the England & Wales High Court (previously mentioned on this blog for his invalidation of a Motorola junk patent and a Nokia v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
The Federal Circuit released its en banc decision in Lexmark v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am
But it is taken into consideration, and a licensing-based business model certainly doesn't weigh in favor of an injunction, which is why "patent trolls" rarely obtain injunctions in U.S. district court at this stage.While we're on the subject of comparative law, I appreciate Professor Thomas Cotter's latest Comparative Patent Remedies blog post, in which he "certainly agree[s] that 'the German statute falls far short of eBay v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 3:58 am
” At the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin (subscription required), Daniel Cotter remarks on the court’s refusal last week to expedite consideration of “the Affordable Care Act challenge in Texas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 3:28 pm
Professor Tom Cotter of the University of Minnesota School of Law believes those cases are no longer good law and that such damages would be available. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
In 'Zervos v Picasso, or copyright v droit d'auteur' , GuestKat Antonella Gentile offers a post on the decision in Zervos v. [read post]
