Search for: "Cross v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2008, 4:46 am
In DOE v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm
The court also held that state respondeat superior law governs the Westfall Act “scope of employment” inquiry, see 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 11:15 am
This defense was first found to be invalid in the Superior Court case of Pringle v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
The Appeals Court determined that in the instant action, the district court ruled that the contribution bar in the 2001 Settlement does not apply to the Intervenors' cross-claims against Sherwin-Williams. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 9:15 pm
Superior Court (Spencer) (October 20, 2009) observes that "[i]t is not often that a trial court vacates an arbitration award and an appellate court affirms the order. [read post]
25 Aug 2006, 4:45 am
Per Bannum, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:04 pm
Creative Tech., Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 2:05 pm
(Sullivan v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:47 pm
Cannon v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 10:35 pm
The Superior Court of San Joaquin County (July 16, 2008), the Court considered whether the failure to name a city councilmember as a party to the Petition for Writ of Mandate before the Court of Appeal was a fatal defect to that Petition, given that the councilmember had been a party to a petition filed in the Superior Court. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
Smith, A Guide to Crawford and the Confrontation Clause, in NC Superior Court Judges Benchbook (UNC School of Government Aug. 2015). [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:32 am
” Superior Court Justice Kenneth Campbell wrote that, in R v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 1:35 pm
”On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled in favor of the insured. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
The Court noted that Wickens v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:45 pm
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 1:12 pm
County of San Bernardino, a public entity; City of Highland, a public entity; et al., San Bernardino Superior Court, case no. 1309504, shows that accepted practices are not necessarily safe. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:06 am
Fireside Bank v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:17 am
In SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISIONCHARLES W. [read post]
