Search for: "D. R.C. D."
Results 161 - 180
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2016, 9:14 am
Merit Decision The issue in this case was whether or not the punitive damages cap codified in R.C. 2315.21(D)(2)(a) applied to the verdict. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 6:18 am
(R.C. 2305.113(C) bars claims that have not vested within four years of the negligent act. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:35 am
(R.C. 2305.113(C) bars claims that have not vested within four years of the negligent act. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
” And as a matter of public policy, R.C. 153.19 requires every state-funded public-improvement construction project to include a liquidated-damages provision. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 7:05 am
Procedural Posture All the defendants asserted that since their actions were neither wanton nor reckless, they were immune from liability under R.C. 2744.03(A)(6)(b). [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
R.C. 4141.28 (Determination of benefit rights and claims for benefits) Zier v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:41 am
”) R.C. 1303.31(outlining the requirements of a “Person entitled to enforce” an instrument as any of the following: (1) The holder of the instrument, (2) A nonholder in possession of the instrument who has the rights of a holder, or (3) A person not in possession of the instrument who is entitled to enforce the instrument pursuant to section 1303.38 or division (D) of section 1303.58 of the Revised Code.) [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:39 am
Pryor’s Proposed Counter Proposition of Law I In an unemployment compensation appeal, the statutory requirement to name parties pursuant to R.C. 4141.282(D) is not a jurisdictional requirement necessary to perfect the appeal and vest the trial court with jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
At issue in the case is whether R.C. 2305.23, Ohio’s Good Samaritan statute, provides immunity to a lay person attempting to provide emergency assistance to an injured party at the scene of an accident. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 12:36 pm
(In order to find a defect under R.C. 2307.76, three elements must be satisfied: (1) a duty to warn against reasonably foreseeable future risks, (2) breach of this duty, and (3) injury that is proximately caused by the breach.) [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:28 am
Only the as-applied challenge to R.C. 2315.18, and the number of occurrences are involved in this appeal. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
”) R.C. 2929.13 (F)(6) (A first or second-degree felony sentence must be mandatory if the defendant had a prior conviction for another first or second degree felony, or any other equivalent offense) R.C. 2901.08 (a juvenile adjudication is a conviction for purposes of determining the offense with which the person should be charged and, if the person is convicted of or pleads guilty to an offense, the sentence to be imposed upon the person relative to the conviction or guilty… [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:23 am
Fischer and Rick D. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
R.C. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 7:24 am
”) R.C. 2311.21 (“Unless otherwise provided, no action or proceeding pending in any court shall abate by the death of either or both of the parties thereto, except actions for libel, slander, malicious prosecution, for a nuisance, or against a judge of a county court for misconduct in office, which shall abate by the death of either party. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am
As long as the kirpan remains a symbol and is neither designed nor adapted for use as a weapon, laws such as R.C. 2923.12 are wholly inapplicable. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
R.C. 2901.01(A)(9)(a) and (d) (Defines offenses of violence.) [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Christopher D. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
R.C. 2901.01(A)(9)(a) and (d) (Defines offenses of violence.) [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:54 am
After this case was argued, I wrote that “if I had the power, I would declare this case a draw, with neither side winning,” adding that if I had to, I’d call it for Heritage. [read post]
