Search for: "DAVID W. LAND" Results 161 - 180 of 520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 7:57 am by Simon Lovegrove
The terms of reference states that the indicative dates are: 19 June; w/c 17 July; w/c 28 August; w/c 18 September; and w/c 9 October. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:52 am by Jim Martin
Smith, photograph by David Durham, Bounds Law Library, University of Alabama School of Law Used with permission. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:37 am
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Said, Edward W. and Christopher Hitchens, eds. [read post]
15 May 2017, 7:37 am
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Said, Edward W. and Christopher Hitchens, eds. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
In 1571, an English jurist named Edmund Plowden, trying to make sense of cases involving the sale and purchase of land owned by various monarchs, argued: [T]he King has in him two Bodies, viz., a Body natural, and a Body politic. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:01 am by Andrew Kent
John Yoo, professor at Berkeley Law and controversial for his tenure at OLC during the first term of the George W. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States District Court for the District of Columbia.The Cheney litigation began when various public interest groups sued Vice President Richard Cheney and the National Energy Policy Development Group (NEPDG) that President George W. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 11:04 am by Emma Kohse
Judge Pohn sums up the government’s position: “[W]e give you what we have and the rest just doesn’t exist. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
CBN News also covers the case, noting that the Murrs will “fight for their all-American right to sell their own land before the U.S Supreme Court Monday, March 20. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 11:33 am by Jordan Brunner
The Post notes that Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis has withdrawn retired senior diplomat Anne W. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:29 pm
Courts are reluctant to reform a document w/o clear and convincing evidence, and rarely is the evidence clear or convincing. [read post]