Search for: "DAY, JR. v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT" Results 161 - 180 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2014, 7:40 am by Lisa Milam-Perez
Supreme Court heard oral argument Monday in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Supreme Court heard oral argument in the eagerly anticipated NLRB v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Francisco of the Washington office of the Jones Day law firm, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 11:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Verrilli, Jr., told the Court, “repudiates understandings of the Recess Appointments Clause that have been maintained and relied on by the Executive for most of the Nation’s history. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
Just in time for Romney's two-day Virginia swing, state Democrats announced office openings and nine new hires, including seven regional field directors. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
"  Given that presumptive GOP nominee Mitt Romney has declined to say whether a President Romney would reverse the DHS actions on DREAMers, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should insist that ICE and USCIS engage in formal rulemaking but insure that the process is completed within the 60 days mandated by President Obama and Secretary Napalitano. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day O’Connor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Papageorge, University of San Diego School of Law, Special Prosecutor, San Diego County District Attorney’s Office Thomas Greene, Executive Director, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Professor Jesse W. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm by Roderick Hills - Guest
United States by Roderick Hills, Jr., William T. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The duration of provisional arrest permitted under the new Treaty (60 days) is identical to the current treaty. [read post]