Search for: "Dan Epps"
Results 161 - 180
of 199
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps discuss court-related news from last week, including Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s comments about NFL players’ refusals to stand for the national anthem, the week’s oral arguments and new grants, and the court’s per curiam opinion in Bosse v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:02 am
” In the latest episode of First Mondays, Dan Epps and Ian Samuel discuss what last week’s decision in contracts-clause case Sveen v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:20 pm
Over in the comments to Brian's post, Professor Dan Epps has a suggestion that I think explains a lot: The increasing separateness of the law clerk and law professor track. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:54 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Ian Samuel “round up the latest Kavanaugh news, including speculation on the Bush documents and a debate over whether Democrats should support his confirmation when they disapprove on the merits. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
Bill Mears at CNN, Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, and Andrew Cohen at Politics Daily all preview the case, as does Lyle Denniston for this blog. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 4:26 am
Dan Epps and Ian Samuel look ahead at this week’s cases in the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
Topics include: Standards of review in the WTO tribunal Delegation of risk regulation to private parties Regulating risks through online networks Claire Kelly, Brooklyn Law School (Chair) Tracey Epps, University of Otago, New Zealand (“To Defer or Not to Defer? [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps remarks that the “truculent tone [of the court’s opinion] suggests the new conservative majority will tolerate no more back talk on this death business. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
I've also recorded a podcast episode of Divided Argument with Dan Epps, who testified as a witness in front of the commission, where we go back and forth about the process and some of our proposals for reform. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 3:51 am
Briefly: At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps writes that last week’s decision in Nieves v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Leah Litman recap some of last week’s arguments and look ahead to Thursday’s argument in Gamble v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
” Another look at Ginsburg’s health scare and the rest of last week’s Supreme Court news comes from Dan Epps and Will Baude in the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
1 Dec 2018, 4:12 am
In the meantime, Leah Litman will step up to serve as co-host and co-manager with Dan Epps. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm
First, and perhaps best in my book, there are the first two episodes of the newest season of Divided Argument, my "unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast" with Dan Epps. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 7:15 am
” Justice and the Supreme Court Dan Epps is co-author of the paper behind an oft-cited idea: changing the U.S. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Ian Samuel interview “two-time Supreme Court winner Fane Lozman” – “the man, the myth, the legend. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 2:29 pm
Since 2005, I have assigned 85 books by 79 authors, with Sandy Levinson, Gerard Magliocca, Eric Segall, Dan Farber, Philip Hamburger, and David Bernstein each making 2 appearances. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Dan Epps explores “what the Court might or should do if it agrees … that the ban is, or soon will be, moot. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 4:13 am
In the latest episode of First Mondays (podcast), Dan Epps and Steve Vladeck “take a deep dive into two cases at the intersection of federal courts and foreign relations that are being argued during the November sitting: Jam v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
” At First Mondays (podcast), Ian Samuel and Dan Epps look at some of the cases on this week’s argument agenda and discuss Chief Justice John Roberts’ recent recusal in Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
