Search for: "Dan Kahan" Results 161 - 180 of 202
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
I'm delighted to welcome Dan Kahan as a guest blogger for the month of April. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 4:43 pm
Huang, and Michael Stocker each respond to Dan M. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
-- Howard mentioned the paper by my friends Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and Don Braman, entitled: Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
This paper, which just appeared in the SSRN Empirical & Experimental Journal, sheds some light on the cultural components of reasonableness in Supreme Court jurisprudence: Dan Kahan (Yale), Dave Hoffman (Temple), and Donald Braman (GWU Law), "Whose Eyes are You Going to Believe? [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:10 pm
If this is the sort of thing that floats your boat, then I'll point you to a study by Dan Kahan, James Grimmelmann, and your truly that goes one step further, suggesting how these shifts occur and why they occur in recognizable patterns. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and my colleague Don Braman have responded to my post on their new article on Scott v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
[This post continues the debate about Whose Eyes are You Going To Believe, the draft paper Dan Kahan, Don Braman and I have recently begun to circulate. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 11:15 am
As Dan Kahan and I have both argued, to have a real discussion about this issue, we need to acknowledge not just the doctrinal but the emotional concerns animating people's strongly held positions. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and Donald Braman have posted an interesting new article on Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
As Dan Kahan announced here on Balkin, he, current guest-blogger Don Braman, and I have written a paper testing the majority's view that no reasonable jury could or would find for the plaintiff after watching this videotape. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:09 pm
Don is a member of the Cultural Cognition Project, and coauthor of various articles and papers investigating the effects of culture on law and policy, including Cultural Cognition and Public Policy (with Dan Kahan). [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 6:59 am
" Drawing on work by Dan Kahan, Tushnet says that we might try to "shift our conversation away from polarizing debates about what the Constitution means and what sorts of gun policies actually reduce violence, and toward a respectful acknowledgment of the disparate visions of the good society that pervade American society. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
Shortly afterwards I got an email from Dan Kahan, one of the academics involved, pointing me to work done by him and his colleagues on the Cultural Cognition Project at Yale Law School. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 4:17 am
(This is a point that my colleague Dan Kahan has made in a series of articles over the past decade.).Given the infrequency (and cost) of the death penalty in America, which I do not see changing anytime in the near future, arguments about deterrence are a sort of sideshow that allow people to avoid talking about these larger questions with the hope that they can solve the issue by the application of generous amounts of social scientific studies. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:57 pm
Dan Kahan (Yale University), 1070 citations, age 44. 2. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 7:39 am
A couple of the papers may give you a sense of the thing: Cheshire Calhoun, Department of Philosophy, Colby College, “Hope Matters” [abstract] [full paper PDF] Owen Jones, Vanderbilt University Law School & Department of Biological Sciences, “Biology, Emotions, and Law” [abstract PDF] [precis PDF] Dan Kahan, Yale Law School, “Two Conceptions of Emotion in Risk Regulation” [abstract PDF] [full paper PDF] … [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:48 am
Papers in this issue range from Dan Kahan (Yale) et al.'s assessment of the "white-male" effect in risk perception to Pascoe Pleasence & Nigel Balmer's (Univ. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
Dan Kahan (Yale, Law) and Donald Braman (GW, Law) have posted "The Self-Defensive Cognition of Self-Defense" to SSRN. [read post]