Search for: "Daphne Keller" Results 161 - 180 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Director of the Program on Platform Regulation at Stanford’s Cyber Policy Center Daphne Keller’s testimony before the Senate hearing on platform transparency can be read here. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
Even then, he noted the risk of what Daphne Kellers refers to as “anticipatory obedience,” whereby regulated entities shape their conduct to avoid adverse reactions from the government. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:01 am by Jacob Schulz, Justin Sherman
Two years ago last week, a white supremacist walked into two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand and began spraying bullets upon worshippers, killing 51 people. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 9:59 pm by Morgan Weiland
A few weeks ago, after I published a blog post raising the question of what might happen to CDA 230 when internet intermediaries like Facebook invoke First Amendment protections – which civil liberties lawyers’ were calling on Facebook to do in the wake of the controversy over its trending newsfeed – I was fortunate enough to have a sustained email exchange with UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Anonymous
This piece is exerpted from the Law, Borders, and Speech Conference Proceedings Volume. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 12:19 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
Indeed, as my colleague Daphne Keller explains, it appears that filtering requirements of some sort will now be the law of the land in the European Union thanks to a defamation case, though nobody knows what that fi [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Tutorial “The EU Digital Services Act – Overview and Central Features” General DSA Architecture and Approach      Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Formally, the safe harbor system is still in place for mere conduit, caching and hosting services for third-party information they transmit and store. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
It was a busy media law week at the Royal Courts of Justice, with the seventh week of the Leveson Inquiry and the settlement of 37 phone hacking cases against News International. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:02 pm by Kelsey M. Mackin
MYERS FL MURRELLS INLET HO SC ACWORTH GA AIKEN SC ALABASTER AL ALACHUA FL ALBANY GA ALPHARETTA GA ALTAMONTE SPRINGS FL ANDERSON SC ANTIOCH TN APEX NC APOLLO BEACH FL APOPKA FL ARCADIA FL ASHEVILLE NC ATHENS AL ATHENS GA ATLANTA GA AUBURN AL AUBURNDALE FL AUGUSTA GA AVENTURA FL BARTOW FL BEAUFORT SC BELLEAIR BLUFFS FL BESSEMER AL BETHLEHEM GA BIRMINGHAM AL BLUFFTON SC BOCA RATON FL BONAIRE GA BONITA SPRINGS FL BOONE NC BOYNTON BEACH FL BRADENTON FL BRANDON FL BRASELTON GA BRENTWOOD TN BROOKSVILLE FL… [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 12:42 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
Just as pretty much everybody predicted, SESTA/FOSTA has turned out to endanger sex workers instead of protecting them, and is currently being challenged as unconstitutional in federal court (including by my colleague Daphne Keller). [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm by Genevieve Lakier
For years now, scholars have expressed alarm at the tendency of government officials to use informal means, rather than democratically enacted laws, to pressure the social media companies to take down what they consider to be harmful or offensive speech. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Moderator: Pamela Samuelson, Berkeley Law School From Notice-and-Takedown to Content Licensing and Filtering: How the Absence of UGC Monetization Rules Impacts Fundamental Rights        João Quintais, University of Amsterdam with Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam Human rights impact of the new rules. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:01 am by Zoe Bedell, John Major
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has long provided internet platforms like Twitter and Facebook with immunity from claims based on third-party content that appears on their platforms. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 12:52 pm by Genevieve Lakier
For years now, scholars have expressed alarm at the tendency of government officials to use informal means, rather than democratically enacted laws, to pressure the social media companies to take down what they consider to be harmful or offensive speech. [read post]