Search for: "David Gans"
Results 161 - 180
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Gans, David K. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
” In an op-ed for The (Louisville) Courier-Journal, David Gans argues that the ruling “dealt another blow to our Constitution’s promise of democracy” and “open[s] the door to a whole host of new challenges to state and federal contribution limits, including federal limits on soft money previously upheld by the justices. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:56 am
At Big Think, Steven Mazie discusses what he describes as the alliance of “strange bedfellows” supporting Hobby Lobby and Conestoga, the challengers in the case, while at Balkinization David Gans urges the Court to “recognize that the rights of Hobby Lobby’s thousands of employees – who have deeply held beliefs and convictions of their own – are at stake here, too. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
David H. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 5:50 am
” In an op-ed for the Los Angeles Times, David H. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:24 pm
Gans argues: This spring, the Supreme Court will decide—for the first time in our nation’s history—whether secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to invoke the constitutional guarantee of the... [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
” And at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans compares legislation in Arizona and Kansas with the challenges to the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, arguing that “[t]he efforts to give businesses a right to deny women access to contraceptive coverage and to legalize discrimination against gay men and lesbians are joined at the hip. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David H. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:16 am
Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause, Part III: Reconciling Amos and Cutter Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger, and Micah Schwartzman, Hobby Lobby and the Establishment Clause: Gedicks and the Government David Gans, Can Corporations Exercise Religion? [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:53 pm
David H. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:14 pm
A Slate article by David Gans makes much of the fact that business groups haven’t stood up to support Hobby Lobby’s religious exemption claims: This spring, the Supreme Court will decide — for the first time in our nation’s history — whether secular, for-profit corporations are entitled to invoke the constitutional guarantee of the free exercise of religion. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:59 am
” And at Slate, David Gans argues that, “[a]part from a few isolated briefs from companies just like Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood, the U.S. business community offered no support for the claim that secular, for-profit corporations are persons that can exercise religion. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:55 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, David H. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 6:51 am
Michael McConnell, David Gans, and Jeffrey Rosen discuss the cases and issues in a podcast for the National Constitution Center, while Beverly Mann does the same in a post at Angry Bear. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am
” David L. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:58 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History blog, David H. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 3:04 pm
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, David Gans summarizes the argument – made in a CAC amicus brief – that the Court should not recognize constitutional protection for a corporation’s free exercise of religion. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
Gans responds to Hasen, criticizing what he characterizes as Hasen’s “faulty originalism. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:35 am
” The National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen spoke with David Gans and Ilya Shapiro about the case; that interview is available in a podcast. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:08 am
Contrary to David Gans’ claim, I do not think it is the case that business corporations cannot have religious purposes. [read post]
