Search for: "David R. Lord"
Results 161 - 180
of 632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2017, 11:22 am
Mooney, Pat R. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:09 pm
I know that David Cox and the ARLA team have campaigned for this for a long time, so it must have been very gratifying for David to be able to make the announcement in the afternoon. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:00 pm
We are particularly concerned by David Williams QC’s evidence on the loss of the provisions dealing with international child abduction. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm
Ireland The Irish Times reports that the “Sunday World” newspaper has lost its appeal over a €85,000 award for defamation to a former English Premiership footballer David Speedie. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court has opted for marriage equality, expanding the number of people whose sexual relationships are protected by law. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
Last week in the Courts On 16 January 2017, Sir David Eady heard the PTR and applications in the case of Todary v W1 Cars Ltd. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 5:01 pm
(Nicholas Asfouri/AFP via Getty Images) This post is based on David B. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 6:20 am
"For the moment - an eternity it must have seemed to the others standing by - I was struck dumb with amazement, and when Lord Carnarvon, unable to stand the suspense any longer, inquired anxiously, 'Can you see anything? [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:20 am
Later I consider which letting fees are actually illegal, and read a House of Lords report on housebuilding.. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Lord Advocate replies that this is a fair observation. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 11:00 am
Lord knows he wasn’t my first choice for president, nor did I find most of his policies and especially his overly broad assertion of executive power to my liking. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:27 am
Alexander of Passman & Jones Lois Bacon Special Services Award—Raechel Parolisi, Attorney at Law Pro Bono Coordinator of the Year—Kathleen Tarbox Munoz of Andrews Kurth Kenyon Pro Bono Court Reporter of the Year—Tenesa Shaw of the 192nd Civil District Court Gold Award for Pro Bono Service—Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Andrews Kurth Kenyon, Baker Botts, and Haynes and Boone Silver Award for Pro Bono Service—Cozen O’Connor, Hunton & Williams, Akin Gump… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms ([2000] 2 AC 115) that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to… [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:09 am
Lord Toulson noted the frequently quoted words of Lord Hoffmann in R v Secretary of State for the Home Office, Ex p Simms [2000] 2 AC 115 that “Fundamental rights cannot be overridden by general or ambiguous words” and said importantly that “while Lord Hoffmann said that this presumption will apply “even” to the most general words, but I would say further that the more general the words, the harder it is likely to be to rebut… [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day there was a pre-trial review in the case of Ur-Rahman v ARY Network Ltd, before Sir David Eady. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:37 pm
I think it was Lord Denning who pointed out the difference between an ordinary mind and a lawyer’s mind when he said “An ordinary person would say ‘Look, there are some brown cows in that field but a lawyers mind would say ‘Look. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
(per Lord Clarke). [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
Unanimously dismissing the appeal, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes and Lord Toulson held that if O’s claim for judicial review had been permitted to proceed, the outcome would at best be a declaration that her detention was unlawful and an award of only nominal damages. [read post]
