Search for: "David Sanger"
Results 161 - 180
of 305
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2015, 12:14 pm
” The Times’s David Sanger notes that one senior IAEA official noted worries that the report would embolden other countries interested in nuclear weapons, sa [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 5:25 am
David Sanger reported over the weekend that “the United States and China are negotiating what could become the first arms control accord for cyberspace, embracing a commitment by each country that it will not be the first to use cyberweapons to cripple the other’s critical infrastructure during peacetime. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am
” David Sanger reports that President Obama recently had this to say about the matter: “There comes a point at which we consider this a core national security threat. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 11:14 pm
Matt Apuzzo, David Sanger and Michael Schmidt of the New York Times report that when the Department of Justice asked Apple to turn over text messages of iPhone owners, Apple's response was no — because the encryption that Apple uses makes it impossible to do so. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 2:45 am
A month ago David Sanger reported that the administration “has determined that it must retaliate against China for the theft of the personal information of more than 20 million Americans from the databases of the Office of Personnel Management, but it is still struggling to decide what it can do without prompting an escalating cyberconflict. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:47 am
Jack noted David Sanger’s recent story on the U.S. government’s difficulties in figuring out how best to respond to the OPM hack. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
David Sanger has a very damning story on the USG’s struggles to figure out how to respond to the OPM hack. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
David Sanger has a very damning story on the USG’s struggles to figure out how to respond to the OPM hack. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 12:40 pm
In some ways the most interesting of the discussions—marred only by unfortunate glitches in the audio—is Rogers's discussion with David Sanger, in part because of the truly artful manner in which Sanger posed questions that Rogers could actually address in a public forum. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
Advanced by David Sanger at the New York Times, this interpretation is based largely on the signatures of some of President Obama’s closest advisors on the Iran nuclear issues, including Robert Einhorn and Gary Samore. [read post]
20 May 2015, 11:57 am
’” David Sanger and Nicole Perlroth of the New York Times cover the story; you can find the indictment here. [read post]
20 May 2015, 8:02 am
.'” David Sanger and Nicole Perlroth of the New York Times cover the story; you can find the indictment here. [read post]
8 May 2015, 1:04 pm
While the U.S. government has been focused on Iran’s nuclear program, North Korea has been on “an atomic spending spree,” writes David Sanger of the Times. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:24 am
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the NSA’s warrantless bulk collection of Americans’ phone records under Section 215 of the Patriot Act is illegal. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 11:21 am
In the New York Times, David Sanger explains that as the talks continue, the United States and Iran are finding it “harder to hear each other. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:47 am
But the Bill could be much clearer on the precise “agreement” it is referring to, especially since (as Sanger and Gordon report in the NYT this morning) various agreements of various forms are in play. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
"Hoss" Cartwright leaked highly sensitive information to New York Times reporter David Sanger. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
The New York Times’ David Sanger has more. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Philip, Isaac, Lehman, Jacob, David, Sam, and Alexander Sanger established their wholesale and retail dry goods firm in 1857. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am
At Slate, David Herzig contends that the Court will vote to strike down state bans on same-sex marriage to avoid “large-scale tax problems for tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of taxpayers. [read post]