Search for: "David v. Sullivan" Results 161 - 180 of 503
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am by Edith Roberts
Sullivan, noting that if the Court accepts the case, “the implications could be significant for criminal-justice reporting. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬ The resulting case,Grand Upright Music Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:07 am by Amy Howe
” At ACSblog, Ronald Sullivan urges the Court to grant review in the case of David Brown, a Louisiana death-row inmate, arguing that only the Court “can now correct matters and give the state’s prosecutors and courts direction on the due process rights of defendants. [read post]
19 May 2016, 4:06 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in Spokeo v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 6:10 am
Hariton, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Wednesday, April 20, 2016 Editor's Note: This post is based on a Sullivan & Cromwell LLP publication authored by David P. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:48 pm by Molly Runkle
This morning the Court heard argument in Zubik v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am by D. Daxton White
According to the SEC website, the following are xamples of SEC enforcement actions against Ponzi schemes: 2014 ·         Neal V. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:13 am by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel and UC Berkeley Jurisprudence & Social Policy Ph.D. candidate David Louk on next Monday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:13 am by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel and UC Berkeley Jurisprudence & Social Policy Ph.D. candidate David Louk on next Monday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 7:13 am by Daniel Hemel
Assistant Professor Daniel Hemel and UC Berkeley Jurisprudence & Social Policy Ph.D. candidate David Louk on next Monday’s Supreme Court oral argument in Friedrichs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
I’m hopeful that this latest decision — the second time (see Sullivan v Government of USA [2012] EWHC 1680 (Admin)) that a U.K. court has found that U.S. civil commitment procedures violate basic human rights — though from a foreign court interpreting foreign law, will add to the weight and persuasiveness of the constitutional challenges to these schemes. [read post]