Search for: "Davis v. Social Security Administration"
Results 161 - 171
of 171
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2009, 10:02 am
Davis, in which he argued that the Social Security Act's provision for unemployment insurance was a device to overcome states' fear of being generous with UI benefits and thereby becoming welfare magnets. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 10:31 pm
Davis On Remand from the United States Supreme Court 08a0290p.06 2008/08/13 Beuke v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
Koorsen Fire & Security, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
The following list of the situation in other European countries was provided by the European Court of Human Rights in its decision to reject the UK Government's appeal against the ECHR's judgment in the case of Hirst v the United Kingdom:Prisoners may vote in 16 countries: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina (unless serving a sentence imposed by the International Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia), Cyprus (though they must happen to be out of prison on the day of the elections)… [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 12:05 pm
Comm Social Security Western District of Tennessee at Jackson 08a0356n.06 Directv Inc v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Plaintiffs brought the present action against defendant-appellee Michael Leavitt, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services ("defendant" or "the Secretary"), pursuant to Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 6:24 am
For a more complete picture of a federal judge's total compensation, it is also important to point out the "Rule of 80", a dream-come-true retirement package that puts Social Security quite to shame. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Jones, 13 Wall. 679; Davis v. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:25 pm
That the plaintiff, by reason of age, infirmity, or otherwise, is now or may be entitled in the future to receive any compensation or benefits by reason of the Social Security Law of the United States or from any governmental agency such as the veterans' Administration, Medicare, or sources of this nature.5.ATTACKS ON PLAINTIFF'S TRIAL COUNSEL BY DEFENSE ATTORNEYS. [read post]
