Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 161 - 180
of 647
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
On the same day Warby J handed down judgment in the case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 3234 (QB). [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
After four days of vote-counting, CNN was first to call the election in Biden’s favour at 11.24am Eastern US time. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm
The appellate panel began by citing Cole v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 4:31 pm
As already mentioned, on the same day there was a CMC in the case of Various Claimants v MGN Ltd before Mann J. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:52 pm
The FVRA limits the time during which an office may be filled by an acting official to 210 days (with certain exceptions not relevant here). [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Eight days later, the Supreme Court denied the application in Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
On the same day the libel trial in the case of Gubarev v Orbis Business Intelligence will begin before Warby J. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
” Shelley, a former WCBS-TV executive producer as well as director of digital services, told me that RTDNA groups have been trying to develop “correct verbiage to use in news stories” to understand how to be respectful of law enforcement officers.4 “No journalist goes out in the field planning to get arrested,” Shelley says, admitting that sometimes reporters are “just in the wrong place at the wrong time. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
INTRODUCTION Recently RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki admitted she really didn’t understand the term “systemic racism” and later showed she was correct when she provided an old and obvious example of indirect discrimination as an example of systemic racism. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:11 am
Nyanzi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am
FEC v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:48 pm
In The Commissioner of Competition v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
