Search for: "Day v. Roberts et al" Results 161 - 180 of 560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2018, 2:06 pm
Today, the Florida Supreme Court issued the following Order in CASE NO.: SC18-1573, League of Women Voters, et. al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 2:14 pm by Law Lady
Appeals -- Appellate court lacks jurisdiction of appeal of final judgment where no notice of appeal was filed within thirty days of date judgment was final and appealable -- Motion for supplemental final judgment was not an authorized and timely motion that would suspend rendition of final judgment -- Supplemental final judgment ruling on entitlement to attorney's fees is not final or appealable where amount to be awarded has not been determined
CATALINA HALNAT, LLC, et… [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Cody M. Poplin
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
  The specific issue in Kiyemba, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am by dferriero
Bush Presidential Library and Museum, Robert Holzweiss, PhD., Deputy Director from the George Bush Presidential Library and Museum, and Professor Alston V. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
  But three other relevant factors favored EOIR and carried the day a matter of law. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 9:06 pm
Two other District residents joined in the lawsuit (Heller, et al., v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
” The ACLU and lawyers for two military psychologists who helped develop the CIA’s post-9/11 enhanced interrogation program released a statement announcing a settlement today in Salim et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 1:44 pm
Iqbal, et al. (07-1015), where the Second Circuit allowed a Bivens suit to proceed against FBI Director Robert Mueller, former Attorney General John Ashcroft and various prison officials over alleged detainee discrimination after September 11, 2001 (filings available here). [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 4:51 pm
CSC Holdings, Inc., et al. (08-448). [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:43 am by Florian Mueller
Even though the MPEG-2 patent pool is not identical to the AVC/H.264 pool, it's possible that Motorola wanted to distance itself from reasonably-priced video codec patent license offers.This new Mitsubishi et al. v. [read post]