Search for: "Deal v. Warner" Results 161 - 180 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 6:28 am by David Markus
  Good stuff.And in your moment of Zen, indicted defendant Jack Warner cited to the Onion to support his claim that the U.S. is picking on him. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
In fact I’ve known patent attorneys who deal with Swiss style claims every day. [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:23 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright Office: Jacqueline CharlesworthMichelle ChoeRegan SmithCy DonnellySteve RuheJohn RileyStacy Cheney (NTIA) Proposed Class 5: Audiovisual works – derivative uses – multimedia e-books This proposed class would allow circumvention of access controls on lawfully made and acquired motion pictures used in connection with multimedia e-book authorship. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Facing scrutiny from regulators, Comcast abandoned its $45 billion bid for Time Warner Cable, ending what would have been a deal between the country’s two largest cable operators. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am by Ben
 Repeal of section 52 of the CDPA will take effect on 06 April 2020: Following the repeal, parties that are currently trading in copies will have an indefinite period to sell off their stock, and may freely deal with copies made prior to the change of the law without this being an infringement. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Time Warner, Inc., 153 Cal.App.4th 1337 (2007) – which concerned Marlon Brando’s will – on the basis that Ms Love did not have the public interest or following that Brando had. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 4:26 am by Mark Summerfield
Australia’s competition watchdog has failed to convince a Federal Court judge that a strategy employed by pharmaceutical company Pfizer, to enter the market for generic products upon expiry of its patent covering blockbuster cholesterol-lowering drug LIPITOR, constituted an illegal misuse of market power, or ‘exclusive dealing’: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Pfizer Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 113.From the year 2000, when it acquired… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014]… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * Bayer feels the pain: branded Naproxen can't invoke the territoriality principleKatfriend Marty Schwimmer reports on Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG and Bayer Healthcare LLC, 1:14-cv-00847-GBL (EDVA Feb. 6, 2015), a recent US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia ruling that deals with Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in the US as it applies to Bayer’s trade mark ‘FLANAX’. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However, back in 2009 the same estate had granted DreamWorks and Warner Bros a licence to reproduce King's speeches in a film that Steven Spielberg is set to produce but has yet to see the light. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
WMG proposed a two-part compromise to artists with record deals that pre-date 2002. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Nothing to do with us, mate – Google and Facebook http://t.co/pfKbOL0sLe -> Dotcom Loses Lawyers – Then They Erase All History of Him http://t.co/pU34G2RkGR -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12: Supreme Court of Canada to rule on role of good faith in co… http://t.co/Uhxaty3mI3 -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2014-11-12 http://t.co/hD2LLSRThd -> Supreme Court of Canada ‘updates’ common law to make good faith an implied… [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Supreme Court of Canada ‘updates’ common law to make good faith an implied term of all contracts http://t.co/XxVTYmxLdp -> No privacy in school cell phone use Ratt v Tournier, 2014 SKQB 353 http://t.co/O5449DWfIw -> SCC bombshell case recognizing general contract duty to act in good faith Bhasin v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr linked to the audio in Klayman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:01 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Time Warner (Catch-up Post) Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 1:04 am by Ben
 At a conference jointly held by Zhuoya Research Center, Tsinghua University and China Intellectual Property Society, experts agreed that China's Internet Copyright Law is in urgent need of revision to deal with increasing infringements and keep up with fast-changing technology. [read post]