Search for: "Defendants 1-100 inclusive" Results 161 - 180 of 351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am by Jessica Kroeze
According to this board, the RPBA, also in view of Art. 23 thereof, although it can specify and interpret the provisions of the EPC, it cannot confer on the Boards of appeal powers which the EPC does not give them.Consequently, the proprietor's assertion concerning the nature of the adhesive used, first presented in its letter of 15 October 2015, constitutes a new argument in support of the plea which it defends, namely: that the subject matter of claim 1 is novel compared to… [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm by Shea Denning
G.S. 14-100 makes it a felony to intentionally make a false and deceptive representation that is calculated and intended to deceive, and which does in fact deceive, and by which the defendant obtains or attempts to obtain anything of value from another person. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Every year just after Labor Day, I take a step back and survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and D&O insurance. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Elizabeth A.C.C. (28 NY3d 1 [2016]), which expansively defined who is a Aparent@ under Domestic Relations Law ' 70. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Eric Goldman
Instead, here is the Senate Judiciary Committee report’s 3,000 word “summary”: ___ This bill would establish the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the Act) to become operative on January 1, 2020, contingent on the privacy initiative being withdrawn from the ballot pursuant to Section 9604 of the Elections Code. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
In its reply, the Respondent (Patent Proprietor) rebutted the objections and arguments of the Appellant and defended the patent as granted. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am by Diane Tweedlie
The independent claims of this request are identical to those of the request held allowable by the opposition division, and therefore the inclusion of an additional dependent claim cannot be considered either a legitimate reaction to the impugned decision or a legitimate attempt to defend the patent in view of objections newly raised by the opponent (appellant 2) in its grounds of appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am by Diane Tweedlie
The independent claims of this request are identical to those of the request held allowable by the opposition division, and therefore the inclusion of an additional dependent claim cannot be considered either a legitimate reaction to the impugned decision or a legitimate attempt to defend the patent in view of objections newly raised by the opponent (appellant 2) in its grounds of appeal. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:09 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Murdock agreed to pay the settlement amount on the defendants’ behalf. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 8:47 am
Sovereign conduct on the margins of the law, the title of the Symposium for which this Article was produced,[1] is perhaps no better manifested than in the commercial activities of states. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I have set out below the Top Ten D&O stories of 2017, with an eye to these future possibilities. 1. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Venezuela ban is qualitatively different from the others because it extends only to government officials, and the ban on North Korea will, according to Department of State statistics, affect fewer than 100 people....Thus, while Defendants assert that the Proclamation’s travel ban was arrived at through the routine operations of the government bureaucracy, the public was witness to a different genealogy, one in which the President—speaking “straight to the… [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Standing is a threshold jurisdictional issue that requires the plaintiffs to show that they have (1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendants, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by Kevin
We also have a new paragraph V in that section, again with cross-references; but worst of all, having just changed the Fetus Exception to a Partial Fetus Inclusion, they immediately created a partial exception to that partial inclusion. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 1:50 pm by Giles Peaker
Under Islington’s allocation scheme, she was assessed as having 110 points (100 residence points for living in the borough for 3 of the last 5 years, and 10 ‘homeless points’). [read post]