Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 6,447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2023, 4:36 pm by Ryan E. Long
For example, in a recent decision from United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
But times have changed, and current law promotes maximum contact between children and their separated or divorced parents and the sharing of decision making, unless this is contrary to the best interests of the children, as may be the case, for example, where there is a high degree of ongoing conflict between separated or divorced parents or family violence precludes maximum contact or shared decision making on major matters affecting the children. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:22 pm by Ilya Somin
Worcester ed., 1859) (defining "office" as "a publick charge or employment; magistracy");United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
CPLR § 2106 also provides: ”(b) The statement of any person, when that person is physically located outside the geographic boundaries of the United States, Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, or any territory or insular possession subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, subscribed and affirmed by that person to be true under the penalties of perjury, may be used in an action in lieu of and with the same force and… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 8:31 pm by centerforartlaw
DABUS also encountered resistance in the United States, with the USPTO denying patent applications despite some indications of support within the field. [read post]
The HKEX stated that issuers’ boards that are only composed by members of one gender will be in contravention of its Listing Rules. [read post]