Search for: "Department of Employment v. United States" Results 161 - 180 of 4,187
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am by R. Scott Adams
Consequently, the Department of Homeland Security recently created a new process to enable Afghan nationals to renew their parole and extend employment authorizations for two additional years. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:17 pm by Tobin Admin
An earlier case, the Supreme Court concluded that a ports authority was entitled to sovereign immunity because it was a State administrative unit responsible for the State’s docks. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these figures do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm by Frank Cranmer
The most recent example is the Grand Chamber case of S, V and A v Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, 22 October 2018. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
ANALYZING THE LEGAL STANDARD Who counts as an officer of the United States? [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:40 am by Shearil Matthews
Dallas County,[1] the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, handed down a significant Title VII ruling that has far-reaching implications for future employment discrimination cases in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Clint Feddersen, Workers’ Compensation Judge Disclaimer: The material and any opinions contained in this treatise are solely those of the authors and are not the opinions of the Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers’ Compensation, or the WCAB, or any other entity or individual. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:37 am by Eugene Volokh
The sensitivity of the timing of such investigations is recognized in memoranda distributed to employees of the United States Department of Justice. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:56 am by Unknown
The government submits that the United States has a significant interest in the question presented because the DOL enforces the SOX provision and the SEC has an interest in protecting whistleblowers. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:21 am by Geoff Schweller
Court of Appeals decision applying the Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex rel. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Case No. 6:23-cv-59-JDK, vacating certain portions of 45 C.F.R. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]