Search for: "Department of Revenue v. Public Service Co." Results 161 - 180 of 342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 10:20 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Her day-to-day work encompasses both labor and employment issues, as well as independent contractor, outsourcing, employee leasing, management services and other nontraditional service relationships. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13, April 21 and April 28 conferences)   Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the April 13 and April 21 conferences)   Sonoco Products Co. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by John Elwood
Department of Revenue for the State of Washington, 16-308, presents just the retroactivity issue. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:14 pm by Steven Boutwell
Louisiana Implications The Louisiana Department of Revenue (the “Department”) has not issued guidance regarding how it intends to apply Louisiana’s throw-out rule. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
In addition to affirming President Trump’s commitment to seek the prompt repeal of the ACA, the Executive Order seeks to mitigate the burden of the ACA pending Congressional repeal by ordering  the Departments Health and Human Services (HHS), Labor (DOL), Treasury (Treasury)  and other agencies with ACA authority (Agencies) to exercise all available authority and discretion to the “maximum extent permitted by law:” To waive, defer, grant… [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 3 November 2016. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm by Barry Sookman
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
An agreement between Blue Bell and the Texas State Department of Health Services requires the company to pay $175,000 within 30 days of the signing of the agreement. [read post]