Search for: "Dept of Justice" Results 161 - 180 of 3,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2023, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Matter of Hersh, 102 AD3d 871 [2d Dept 2013] [affirming denial of dismissal of petition for corporate dissolution under Section 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law]). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 7:19 am by Zak Gowen
  American Red Cross spars with US Justice Dept over scope of antitrust law. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:26 pm by Jeralyn
All thoughts about Donald Trump, everyone involved in all four cases against him, and the criminal justice system where he now faces the awesome powers of the Dept of Justice when it decides to drop its rage on you. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Phillips-Smith Special Retail Group IL L.P. v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, L.L.P, 265 AD2d 208,210 [1st Dept 1999].) [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 5:51 am by Tom Joscelyn
What follows are some initial observations on the indictment – including the significance of new evidence it indicates are in the Justice Department’s hands. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature written by a bunch of people at the Institute for Justice. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:39 am by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
State of Florida, Dept. of Health, 485 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), the claimant was assaulted in the lobby of her place of employment 20 to 30 minutes prior to the beginning of her shift. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
” (CPLR 302 [a] [1]; Aybar v US Tires & Wheels of Queens, LLC, 211 Ad 3d 40, 48-49 [2d Dept 2022].) [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:37 am by Dan Tokaji
Doughty imposed… Continue reading The post “Justice Dept. asks 5th Circuit to delay judge’s social media order” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Peter Mahler
LP (1st Dept 2011), Stone v Frederick (3d Dept 1997), and Giaimo v EGA Associates (1st Dept 2009), cement the concept that, where the by-laws do not overtly give the president the right to commence litigation, and there is board or shareholder deadlock about the propriety of doing so, the president then lacks the authority to bring an action directly in the name of the corporation. [read post]