Search for: "Disney v. Disney" Results 161 - 180 of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2009, 3:13 pm
“It sounds like a Revlon claim,” said Chiappinelli, referring to the 1986 Delaware Supreme Court decision Revlon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Walt Disney… https://t.co/sYlsefKRMv 2021-07-14 Scroll wrap agreement not enforced by NJ court, Wollen v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:52 am
VentureBeat is reporting that a settlement has been reached in the Zynga v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2022-08-27 https://t.co/jntt9vIVgw 2022-08-28 NIST Releases Second Draft of AI Risk Management Framework https://t.co/g907e8YcUP 2022-08-29 Artificial Intelligence System Cannot Be Listed as Inventor https://t.co/GuPWwQpX2R 2022-08-29 Legal Implications of the Ethereum Merge and Potential Ethereum Proof-of-Work Fork https://t.co/lw3VK5Q0nI 2022-08-29 Google’s defamation liability: Google LLC v Defteros https://t.co/578ejbaFcq… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 6:45 am by Terry Hart
Currently on appeal to the 9th Circuit after a District Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, Disney v VidAngel raises a number of issues, including Section 1201, first sale, and fair use, but defendants argue their video on demand service is authorized by an obscure provision in the Copyright Act that allows viewers to filter out mature elements from authorized copies of movies. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:00 pm
  The case is Disney Enterprises Inc et al v VidAngel Inc, 9th U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:18 pm
Following the example set by Disney in keeping Mickey Mouse both fashionable and highly IP-protectable through a succession of makeovers, The Daily Mail reports that the world's best-known fictitious Cumbrian character, Postman Pat, has been updated too. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:34 pm
The saga regarding Segways at Disneyland continues.Suffice it to say that the California Court of Appeal is not nearly as fond of the machine as the Ninth Circuit.Today's opinion is published a year after the Ninth Circuit's opinion. [read post]