Search for: "Doe Defendants 1-10"
Results 161 - 180
of 12,347
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 3:30 am
It provides the following rules for prison inmates: A defendant who is convicted of first-degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9-1) or terrorism (720 ILCS 5/29D-14.1) does not get early release and must serve 100% of their sentence. [read post]
4 May 2017, 1:57 pm
Id. at 10, 15-19. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 10:49 am
If the conviction is for 1 kilogram or more of cocaine, the base sentence is at least 10 years. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am
Or is this a case where the defendant ‘threatened to infringe’ the trade mark (Art. 130(1) EUTMR), depending on the further intentions of the defendant? [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 3:56 am
Contrary to the third-party defendants’ contention, their submission of a retainer agreement between themselves and Hall failed to conclusively establish that no attorney-client relationship existed between the third-party defendants and Hobbick with respect to the purchase of the Brooklyn property by Hall and Hobbick (see CPLR 3211[a][1]). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 1:32 pm
§ 1512(b)(1) (count 7). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
" Apodaca, 406 U.S. at 409–10 (plurality opinion). [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:26 pm
Aurora Corp., 1-07-cv-07237 (ILND February 10, 2009, Memorandum Opinion) [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:50 am
The test includes four components: 1. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
Summarized the newspaper:In general, the report found that the public defender's office does more investigation, which leads to better results in court, advocates for the defense bar in community issues and offers free training, mentoring and advice that was not available before.Those courtroom results include a greater proportion of dismissals, deferred sentences and acquittals. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:04 am
App. 10/16/13) is one of those cases. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:44 am
Point 1 is run under s. 10(1) Trade Marks Act 1994 (TMA 1994) i.e. a double identity infringement claim. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
., Inc. (10/1/15) --- Cal.App.4th ---, the plaintiff complained to police that her wedding ring had been stolen at work, and the defendant terminated her because the police investigation was disrupting the workplace. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 pm
Indeed, as indicated above, defendant does not even acknowledge his status as a fourth-offense habitual offender when making this argument on appeal. [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Slip op. at 10. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:37 am
Does 1-10, the appellate court held that Dendrite did not apply because the defendants’ actions were “no different than if they had broken into the hospital and spray painted their messages on the hospital’s walls. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:56 pm
This court would, therefore, grant defendant's application for a downward departure to Level 1. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 10:45 am
§ 10-1-767(a). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 5:40 am
See Practice Book § 61-10 (b). [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 8:10 am
Cisco Systems, Inc., 1-10-cv-01306 (ILND June 17, 2010, Memorandum Opinion) (Der-Yeghiayan, J.) [read post]
