Search for: "Doe Defendants I through X" Results 161 - 180 of 982
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2014, 9:31 am
 Assume I've been appointed to represent a criminal defendant on appeal. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm by Lawrence Solum
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:03 pm by Mark Bennett
One of the things that struck me when I read the last batch of letters sent to defendants in Harris County criminal cases was the common use of the word “reasonable” to describe fees. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:34 pm
I must be an optimist, because I suffered all the way through Jonah Goldberg’s screedy Los Angeles Times column yesterday about how the liberals are a-gonna destroy free speech. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:15 pm by Dan Markel
Scott Shapiro and others have defended the idea that there is an authority of law in liberal democratic regimes such that the fact of legislation to do X provides a free-standing (though probably still defeasible) reason to X. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 6:34 pm by Dennis Crouch
” = = = = Question: How does the printed-matter-doctrine apply to letters that can only be read using an X-ray? [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:14 pm by David Hansen, JD
 This post from TechDirt does a good job working through the copyright-related arguments made by Public.Resource.org. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:14 pm by David Hansen, JD
 This post from TechDirt does a good job working through the copyright-related arguments made by Public.Resource.org. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:14 pm by David Hansen, JD
 This post from TechDirt does a good job working through the copyright-related arguments made by Public.Resource.org. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
If the distinguishing feature is X, the problem is not to find X, but how to achieve the effect that X has. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 12:54 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And, I am afraid, American law schools do relatively little to educate our students, save for those who are self-motivated to learn through, e.g., taking often excellent clinics. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 9:41 pm
Less obviously, that X is a legal cause of Y does not entail that X is a cause-in-fact of Y. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
 The state claims got dismissed for X reason, but X no longer exists. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:41 am by stevemehta
Thus, while “[i]t is true that statutory elder abuse includes `neglect as defined in Section 15610.57? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Instead of competing by building new features or devices, they are fighting through litigation. [read post]