Search for: "Doe L.L.C. 1-20" Results 161 - 180 of 184
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am by Steven M. Taber
According to EPA, 122 Chestnut, L.L.C., failed to provide tenants with lead hazard information pamphlets; failed to include lead warning statements in leases; failed to include a disclosure statement regarding lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in leases; and failed to include lists of records or reports pertaining to lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in leases. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:47 pm
" Personalized Media Commc'ns, L.L.C. [read post]
18 May 2010, 1:10 am
Taflove (Chicago IP Litigation Blog)   US Trademarks $20 million award to Versace: any details? [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
– Associated Press and fair use (Spicy IP) Copyright office: Copyright royalty judges have subpoena power over non-witnesses (Copyright Litigation Blog) International law: Wrestling the dead hand of history – Panel on Nazi looted art (Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Decisions District Court E D Pennsylvania: $20 million copyright infringement jury award upheld in case concerning filched sales materials later used to poach clients: Graham v Haughey… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:04 am by nyinjuries
  On the night of the incident, the plaintiffs and their two sons, approximately 18 and 20 years old, returned to their apartment. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 1:44 am
Mason"The 20-year term established by the Legislature for New Jersey judgments can be extended for an additional 20-year term, provided the creditor files a timely motion to revive and satisfies the Kronstadt elements. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 11:21 am
Thus, the Board reasoned, applying Oil Capitol does not require re-litigation. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 11:08 am
Littlefield.1 We address a single dispositive issue on review, namely, whether the trial court properly determined that the ten-year statute of repose contained in Indiana Code Section 34-20-3-1 does not apply to Akaiwa's cause of action. [read post]
18 May 2007, 3:45 pm
On July 20, 2005, the Board granted the Employer's request for review. [read post]