Search for: "Doe Physicians 1-40" Results 161 - 180 of 551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2010, 7:45 am by Moseley Collins
These injuries were preventable had the Defendant, Healthcare’s and DOES 1-10, provided enough sufficiently trained staff at Doctor’s Medical Center to provide John with the amount of care that state and federal regulations required. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
 Just as physicians have varied reactions to allegedly withheld information, so does the FDA. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 6:14 am by Richard Pecore
State Fee Splitting Prohibitions Many states have enacted “Corporate Practice of Medicine” and/or “Fee-Splitting” statutes which prohibit the payment by a physician of a portion of his professional fees to a non-physician or to a physician who was not involved in the delivery of the professional service. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 2:00 pm by Tom Lamb
The prescribing information for physicians and pharmacists does not provide realistic schedules for dose tapering or a clear picture of the likely incidence of these reactions.... [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:43 am
” The Court also concluded that “the cap, to the extent it includes nurse practitioners within its ambit, violates the equal protection guarantees of the Louisiana Constitution and La.R.S. 40:1299.41(A)(1), and, thus, is unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Unfortunately, the medical regime usually does not stay consistent. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
  But the injured worker does not qualify as a medical physician. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:06 pm by Larissa Morgan
Importantly, the Act does not restrict directorial positions to health professionals with certain medical education beyond the federal requirement that a nurse practitioner or physician leads the care team. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm by Steve Delchin
  The panel first concluded that the individual mandate does not violate plaintiffs’ right of intimate association because plaintiffs did not show how their right to associate intimately with physicians was infringed. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:31 pm by emagraken
 Today the BC Court of Appeal released useful reasons for judgement confirming that hearsay evidence does not render an expert report inadmissible. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 7:25 am by ebcarpenter
*It shall be an affirmative defense to any charge under this Paragraph pursuant to this Section that the label on the container of the prescription drug or the manufacturer’s package of the drug does not contain a warning against combining the medication with alcohol. (5)  The operator is under the influence of one or more drugs which are not controlled dangerous substances and which are legally obtainable with or without a prescription and the influence is caused by the operator… [read post]