Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 161 - 180
of 36,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 6:17 pm
The Cite Lesher v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:16 am
Attorney 2 takes their time and does nothing. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:44 am
How does this restelss movement affect legal malpractice clients? [read post]
3 May 2021, 4:48 am
An order which does not decide a motion made on notice is not appealable as of right (see CPLR 5701[a][2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333, 335; Deutsche Bank Natl. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 3:00 am
When the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 9:42 am
NO-FAULT - ATTORNEY'S FEES - PER CLAIMAlpha Chiropractic, P.C. a/a/o Stephen Whyte v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 5:40 am
A new "John Doe" case named Arista v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
(This does not mean the plaintiff pays defendant's attorneys fees, but it does mean plaintiff gets no attorneys' fees after the date the Offer was made).In this case, plaintiff sued the bank for improper overdraft fees. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:39 am
Does the Punishment Fit the Crime? [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 7:49 am
Counsel does not perform a best interests analysis or make custody-related recommendations. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 1:50 pm
Comments from attorneys and litigants who’ve made this argument are most welcome Moore v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:00 pm
The Court will be deciding this issue: Does the rule that, in order to receive attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, the plaintiff must first reasonably attempt to settle the matter short of litigation, apply to this case? [read post]
31 May 2012, 9:02 pm
While the details of the actual staffing issue are better left for a human resources attorney, the case does have Internet law implications. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
As an initial matter, the Court of Appeal explained that "the UCL does not provide for attorney fees" and that prevailing plaintiffs generally "seek attorney fees as a private attorney general pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:24 pm
Baumann is represented by Capstone Law APC), holding that a pure Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”) action does not meet the definition of a “class action” under Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 [...] [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
But Justice Scalia still does. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 11:16 pm
But Justice Scalia still does. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 8:36 pm
Wolfe v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:20 am
In Warren v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 12:31 pm
Background of the Case In Doe v. [read post]
