Search for: "Doe v. Barnett" Results 161 - 180 of 663
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2008, 6:10 am
Instead of protecting the collective rights of the people in the states, Barnett maintains that Ninth Amendment protects only individual rights and cites as critical support the opposition views of the antifederalist Virginia Senate and the majority opinion in Chisholm v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by Randy Barnett
One year later, the Due Process challenge was upheld 5–4 in McDonald v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by Randy Barnett
” But I think there is an existing constitutional doctrine already limiting the commerce power of Congress that does satisfy most of Orin’s competing considerations: the doctrine established by the Court in New York v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:51 pm
Barry Barnett Blawgletter adores Samuel Clemens. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, "'CPLR 5001 operates to permit an award of prejudgment interest from the date of the accrual of the malpractice action in actions seeking damages for attorney malpractice'" (Barnett v Schwartz, 47 AD3d 197, 208 [2007], quoting Horstmann v Nicholas J. [read post]