Search for: "Doe v. Chicago Board of Education" Results 161 - 180 of 252
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 6:31 am by Conor McEvily
Andrew Longstreth of Reuters (via the Chicago Tribune) writes that last Term’s Wal-Mart v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:27 am
In deciding Nieves v Board of Education, City of Chicago, 01-3814, the Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, rejected a claim advanced by Rose Nieves, a City of Chicago school employee, that she had been terminated in retaliation for her exercising her right to free speech, holding that there was no evidence connecting the timing of Nieves' termination when her position was abolished as part of a reduction in force to her exercising her First… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:33 am by Kiera Flynn
”  As an example of government erosion of privacy, the board cites United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:41 pm
Board of Education of the City of Chicago, No. 10-3021 (7th Cir. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: Collective Scienter does not apply to false patent marking: Heathcote Holdings Corp. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm by Peter Tillers
Allen, John Henry Wigmore Professor of Law at Northwestern University, in Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:51 am by Richard Renner
Birmingham Board of Education, 544 U.S. 167 (2005) (Title IX); CBOCS West, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:49 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
“The district court concluded, and we agree, that Silverman’s disagreement with Karvelas’s evaluation does not present a genuine issue of material fact about the reasons for [...] [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:48 am
The legal distinction between domicile and residence Maksym v Board of Election Commissioners, appeal from 2010 COEL 020, #1-1-0033Rahm Emanuel’s claim that he is eligible to run for the office of Mayor for the City of Chicago will be considered by the Illinois State Supreme Court shortly. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
Charon QC’s ongoing satirical series centering on the Muttley Dastardly firm continued recently with this meditation on the state of legal education in the UK and a meeting of the firm’s board. [read post]