Search for: "Doe v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 161 - 180
of 554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2020, 12:45 pm
AB5 does exempt certain industries, companies and workers, but not rideshare services. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm
Internet and Social Media It is reported that a number of virtual private network providers in the U.S. and Canada have shut down their servers in Hong Kong, citing concerns over the national security law. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
Discrimination can of course occur on a wide variety of fronts including, but not limited to, employment, education, housing and insurance…, not to mention on a social level. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
Internet and Social Media The Cyberlaw Clinic blog has a post “230-esque Language in the USMCA: What Does It Mean for the US and Canada? [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
, At Mount Rushmore, Trump exploits social divisions, warns of ... [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
So Trump does discern a subsection of the mob. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
But nor does it colour the delay with culpability. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:57 pm
It includes the American Coronavirus/COVID-19 Election Safety and Security Act, or ACCESS Act. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
(This op-ed was first published in Just Security on April 13, 2020.) [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:04 am
The consultation document does not, however, purport to assess the impact of its proposed regulations on the beneficial impacts. [read post]
