Search for: "Doe v. Delaware"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,834
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 2:33 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 2:03 pm
v Walton et.al. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 3:46 pm
In Coster v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
From Simeone v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am
Waterkotte: Provisional injunctions under unfair competition law The Higher Regional Court of Hamburg addressed the delimitation between Art. 7(1) and (2) of the Brussels Ibis Regulation after Wikingerhof v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:56 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment does not enact the Delaware General Corporation Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
Defendants, citing United States v Bertie Ambulance Serv. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:52 am
The seminal decision, Petruis v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
California does have several exceptions, however, including an important one for individuals selling their interests in a business. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:25 am
The en banc majority disagreed, concluding that Section 115 does not apply to Section 14(a) claims because, according to the Delaware Supreme Court, federal claims are not “internal corporate claims,” and therefore that Section 115 does not prohibit forum-selection clauses that require federal claims to be brought in Delaware state court. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:36 am
The process of conducting director nominations is, under Delaware law, typically addressed by companies through the adoption of advance notice bylaws. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
In Re v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:14 am
Ex re Delaware Tribe v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
In Lee v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Case Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
We might even start with whether Delaware does, in fact, agree that directors may, consistent with their fiduciary duties, completely bar derivative Section 14(a) claims, especially if a situation comes up where, whether due to 102(b)(7) or Delaware’s vision of the direct/derivative distinction, Delaware would not provide any remedy but federal law would provide a derivative one. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:44 pm
Delaware. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:56 am
However, . . . where Plaintiff alleges that the directors of a Delaware corporation breached their fiduciary duties, the issues pertaining to whether Plaintiff has met the threshold for pleading demand futility will be decided under Delaware substantive law”]; Stephen Blau MD Money Purchase Pension Plan Tr. v Dimon, 2015 NY Slip Op 32909[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2015, Singh, J.] [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
It is based on the firm’s memorandum, “Delaware Chancery Court holds Corwin cleansing does not cover defensive measures subject to Unocal,” dated May 31, 2023, and available here. [read post]
