Search for: "Doe v. Dept. of Social Services" Results 161 - 180 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2020, 1:18 am by Josh Blackman
S. ___ (2020) (directive limiting in-person worship services to 50 people); South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Lisa McElroy
New York City Dept. of Social Services, the parents could not sue unless the county had a policy or custom of depriving people of their constitutional rights. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
A6663A Aubry (MS) -- Relates to drug law reform, drug treatment and crime reduction; repealer Same as S 4352-A BLURB : Cor. drug law reform First Act: 03/16/07 referred to codes Last Act: 04/18/07 REFERRED TO CRIME VICTIMS, CRIME AND CORRECTION Old Bill: A8098A of 2006 Old Bill Last Act: 05/08/06 REFERRED TO CRIME VICTIMS, CRIME AND CORRECTION S4543 KRUGER -- Relates to reinstatement of parental rights and vacatur of… [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
Petitioner Bostock worked for the Clayton County Juvenile Court System as a child welfare services coordinator. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
The fact that a wife has the ability to be self-supporting by some standard of living does not mean that she is self-supporting in the context of the marital standard of living. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 9:02 am
  In its ideal form, one autonomous enterprise typically would exchange something of value (usually money or its equivalent) for some of object of value (usually a product of some kind, though also services) with another  autonomous enterprise. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 11:39 am by Stephen Bilkis
In Spoor v Spoor, Laura G v Peter G, South Carolina Dept. of Social Servs. v James C.D. and Werther v Werther, a court's obligation as "parens patriae" to protect a child on issues of child support was stringently applied. [read post]