Search for: "Doe v. Doe, III." Results 161 - 180 of 10,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm by Annsley Merelle Ward
iii) What is the right response to the information Dr Thaler has provided under s.13(2)? [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 3:18 pm by Marc Soss
It is important, to avoid this dilemma, that if you intend to make Florida your permanent residence you: (i) obtain the homestead exemption on your Florida residence; (ii) register to vote in Florida (even if you are renting a home or condominium); (iii) register your vehicles in Florida; (iv) update your estate planning documents to reflect Florida as your state of residency; and (v) affiliate with a Florida house of worship (church, temple, mosque, etc..). [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:32 pm
(I'm thinking, for example, about the rules that used to say that there was no Article III jurisdiction over residents of Hong Kong during the British era because they weren't "citizens or subjects" of a foreign state.)Among the interesting nations in this wide wide world of ours is the Vatican. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am by SHG
Weinstein, Does Religion Have a Role in Criminal Sentencing? [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:16 pm by Marty Lederman
In order even to qualify as a “religious corporation, association, educational institution, or society” eligible for this exemption, an entity must be “primarily religious,” which requires at a minimum that the entity be (i) a nonprofit organization that (ii) is organized for a religious purpose, (iii) is engaged primarily in carrying out that religious purpose, (iv) holds itself out to the public as an entity for carrying out that religious purpose, and (v)… [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 5:43 am
We cannot add the other technical requirements of Title III because Title III does not cover video surveillance. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:33 am by gmlevine
It is true in the precedential cases the Panel cites that “mere assertions of bad faith are insufficient for a complainant to establish Policy ¶ 4(a)(iii),” Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 10:09 am
Kermit Roosevelt III (University of Pennsylvania Law School) has posted Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors (Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 83, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]