Search for: "Doe v. Doe Governmental Entity" Results 161 - 180 of 1,556
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 10:28 am by Kirk Jenkins
 In Harris, the Court held that government entities and public employees operating emergency vehicles were immune from liability for motor vehicle accidents pursuant to the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:42 am by Jessica Jones, Matrix Chambers
An earlier domestic judgment, R v Zardad, also supported the position that a person acting on behalf of a non-State entity may be acting in an official capacity for the purposes of s 134 if the non-State entity “had a sufficient degree of organisation, a sufficient degree of actual control of an area and […] exercised the type of functions which a government or governmental organisation would exercise” [63]. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am by John Day
  As a local governmental entity, Metro is generally immune from suit. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by Unknown
According to the complaint, without the relief sought, the firm faces severe penalties and lacks the opportunity for pre-enforcement judicial review, leaving them with the dilemma of complying with an unconstitutional demand or risking their business's future (John Doe Corporation v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm by Venkat
The Stored Communications Act allows for the disclosure of non-content information to non-governmental entities. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 11:16 pm
Employee’s performing job related “outside work” ruled a conflict of interestReichel v Water Auth., App. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 7:34 am by Eugene Volokh
In cases in which someone seeks to intervene on the side of a governmental entity, the First Circuit and several other courts of appeals apply a presumption that the government will adequately represent the proposed intervenor. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
Therefore, when governments guarantee rights to free speech, what they are really saying is that they will stop individuals and entities from stopping the speech of other individuals. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am by Josh Sturtevant
Therefore, when governments guarantee rights to free speech, what they are really saying is that they will stop individuals and entities from stopping the speech of other individuals. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:28 pm
  The latter distinction concerns whether a governmental entity or party is required to conform to a certain procedure (i.e., obligatory) or whether it “may or may not comply as it chooses” (i.e., permissive). [read post]
12 Aug 2006, 7:14 am
Disclosures to governmental agencies Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1681b of this title, a consumer reporting agency may furnish identifying information respecting any consumer, limited to his name, address, former addresses, places of employment, or former places of employment, to a governmental agency. § 1681g. [read post]