Search for: "Doe v. General Services Admin."
Results 161 - 180
of 251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
But it does not follow that those examples are exhaustive. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:23 am
First up on the admin docket is Finnbin, LLC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
Admin. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm
R (on the application of Calver) v Public Services Ombudsman for Wales [2012] EWHC 1172 (Admin) Censure of Councillor for controversial comments about council meeting on his blog breached his art.10 ECHR free expression rights. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 12:53 am
With regard to “sufficient interest” of campaigning groups or individuals, in their written submissions the petitioners made reference to the considerations by the Administrative Court (Macur LJ, Chamberlain J) in R (McCourt) v Parole Board for England and Wales [2020] EWHC 2320 (Admin). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
Trademark claiming: 2D in terms of having a mark and a class of goods/services. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:23 pm
Admin. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
The emergence of ESG narratives and methodologies has generated reaction--not only in the economic but in the political sphere as well. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 7:27 am
S. 218 (1994);Breyer, Judicial Review of Questions of Law and Policy, 38 Admin. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
” Proposed data reforms intend to address law enforcements’ use of biometric data, but the proposal does not go in-depth on general biometric deployments, TechCrunch reports. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
It held that the general rule in New York is that marital fault should not be considered in determining equitable distribution. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Transit Admin., No. 06-1029, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT, 463 F.3d 50; 2006 U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm
Despite the glee with which admin law academics and practitioners anticipated and met Vavilov, where does this actually leave us? [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:13 am
Auer; Transalta v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has a post entitled “Enhanced Criminal Records Check Mate” concerning the case of R (P & A) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] EWHC 89 (Admin). [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
State Admin. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Admin. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
(v) Three minor violations. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
