Search for: "Doe v. Nielsen" Results 161 - 180 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm by John Lewis
Supreme Court then vacated that decision and remanded it for reconsideration in light of its opinion in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Beth Graham
In addition, the Second Circuit reconsidered and reaffirmed its own holding after the Supreme Court’s decision in both Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:03 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:03 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The Supreme Court initially vacated the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of its decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:31 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
After the arbitrator initially found the parties had agreed to class-wide arbitration, the insurer sought reconsideration on the basis of the Supreme Court’s Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 10:55 am by John Lewis
”  The Court’s ruling disappointed some who expected an expansion of its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:05 am by Steve Vladeck
For the past three years, numerous courts and commentators have understood the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]