Search for: "Doe v. Regents of the University of California"
Results 161 - 180
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Regents of University of California, 47 Cal.3d 376, 392 (1988), the court stated, "An EIR, when looked at as a whole, must provide a reasonable, good faith disclosure and analysis of the project's environmental impacts. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Regents of University of California, 47 Cal.3d 376, 392 (1988), the court stated, "An EIR, when looked at as a whole, must provide a reasonable, good faith disclosure and analysis of the project's environmental impacts. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1135; Abatti v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 1:12 pm
The new proposed rule (if passed) does not explicitly state whether posting a notice would be sufficient, so please stay tuned for updates. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
14 Oct 2024, 7:53 am
v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 4:16 pm
Hart In Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:16 pm
Consider the Court’s 1978 decision in Bakke (Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
The first affirmative action case to be decided by the Supreme Court, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Regents of University of California (1993) 6 Cal.4th 1112, 1123.) [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Regents of University of California v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 7:00 am
Regents of the Univ of California, SCOTUS held that the rescission was procedurally defective. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:39 am
The result has been to contort strict scrutiny to sustain the narrow set of relevant challenged laws, as seen in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 7:34 am
” Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:50 am
(Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
20 May 2021, 9:03 pm
The University of California Board of Regents announced that its schools will not consider SAT or ACT scores in admissions or scholarship decisions for in-state freshman applications through fall 2024. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 3:26 pm
Supreme Court’s Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
