Search for: "Doe v. Schmidt"
Results 161 - 180
of 316
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
I’ve named it after Quick Draw McGraw, one of my favorite, classic Saturday morning TV cartoons, and because it so nicely describes the unusual buy-sell mechanism enforced by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in his fascinating decision earlier this month in Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014]. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
In Fernandez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:16 pm
Both were admitted for use in open court during the first Oracle v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:27 am
Not much, according to a Texas court in Schmidt, L.P., L.L.C. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 10:45 am
Conflicts of interest: the Supreme Court speaksOn July 5, 2013 the Supreme Court issued its judgment in Canadian National Railway v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:30 pm
– Arden Hills lawyer Tiffany Schmidt of Abrams & Schmidt on their Minnesota Labor & Employment Law Blog Fordham Law School Study of Public Schools Finds Widespread Use of Cloud Services, Student Data at Risk – White Plains lawyer Joseph Lazzarotti of Jackson Lewis on the firm’s Workplace Privacy, Data Management & Security Report Heimeshoff v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
I recently obtained from the BPatG a preliminary ruling in which it determined that the patent failed to meet the technicity requirement of European patent law, where software as such is not patentable (didn't I just say that QE does well even without patent attorneys on board?). [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:32 am
In an uninsured motorist benefits case that has gone all the way up the appellate ladder, back down again, and, now, all the way back up, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the matter of Vanderhoff v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:15 am
Schmidt, J.) [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:46 am
Unfortunately, California's solution is no less mockable than Schmidt's. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:18 pm
Schmidt for Appellant. 3. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Most recently (before Schmidt, that is) the court in Massa v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 7:07 am
The exchange of e-mails, however, does not satisfy the statutory requirement of a written instrument signed by the Defendants. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 9:10 am
Schmidt, et al., C.A. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
Sued for Unauthorized Use of Nyan Cat and Keyboard Cat Schmidt v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 6:55 am
In the Lycoming County Court of Common Pleas case of Jacobs v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:27 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:42 am
Then he cited the classical decision in Francis Day v Twentieth Century Fox Corporation to express the view that copyright does not and should not protect short verbal texts. [read post]
