Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court"
Results 161 - 180
of 7,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2013, 11:07 am
” As the Supreme Court has repeatedly emphasized, most recently in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 2:14 pm
Plaintiff files a state court lawsuit through counsel, plaintiff and his attorney decide to file two other duplicative actions in federal court as well "to be safe", and then plaintiff and his attorney decide to dismiss the state suit and one of the federal actions and go forward with the third, and attorney does so. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 6:54 pm
The Riverside Superior Court appellate division says that 23640 does not bar diversion for a misdemeanor DUI. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:51 pm
He asked the superior court to strike one conviction, and they refused to do so. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 10:33 am
Prodigies Child Care Mgmt. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
Superior Court, __ Cal.App. 4th __ (2010), concluding that a proposed class of employees governed by Wage Order 16 were entitled to premium meal period wages for second meal periods notwithstanding Division Four’s prior opinion in Bearden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:00 pm
Superior Court S163335. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
(2) Does Moradi-Shalal v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 1:00 pm
The Court also cited its own decision in M.O. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:12 am
Thornburg in Buncombe County Superior Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 12:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
The Superior Court noted that negligence cannot be invoked to create a duty where one does not exist in the first place. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:10 pm
Superior Court, supra, 108 Cal.App.3d 55, People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:57 am
Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal. 4th 969, 986. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Superior Court, C067309 (Ca Ct. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, 43 Ariz. 68, 81 (1934) (“A court cannot do something not authorized by law, because it may think it is ‘just as good,’ or even better than the thing which the law does sanction. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 9:25 pm
Superior Court, 47 Cal.4th 511, 518-19 (Cal. 2009). [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:37 pm
The Balicki court also indicates that the reliance upon the 1988 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Hovis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 12:29 am
Superior Court (2005) 132 Cal.App.4th 826. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
A recent opinion from the Pennsylvania Superior Court, Commonwealth v. [read post]
