Search for: "Doe v. The Regents of the University of California"
Results 161 - 180
of 311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2018, 10:04 am
Regents of University of California and Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 8:32 am
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
§ 1623; (2) whether a court must undertake conflict preemption analysis after concluding that an express preemption provision does not apply in a case involving both types of preemption claims.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (California Supreme Court)Petition for certiorariBrief of the Regents of the University of California et al. in oppositionBrief of the Board of Governors of the California Community Colleges et al. in… [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 5:40 am
And the law was established in a decision, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 2:36 pm
” In re Regents of University of California, 101 F.3d 1386, 1389 (Fed. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:54 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] Millennium Rock Mortg., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
For the “overall” category—a composite of the five other ratings— a first reader can and does consider the applicant’s race. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm
Citing Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:55 pm
Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479, 51 Cal.3d 120 (1990). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 9:06 pm
One of the leaders of that effort was Ward Connerly, a former college regent in California who had spearheaded the successful “Proposition 209″ campaign in his home state He was joined in Michigan by Jennifer Gratz, a young white woman who had been the lead figure in another 2003 Supreme Court decision, Gratz v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:10 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are not punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
In Marron the Court of Appeal expressly held that the enhanced damages pursuant to 15657 are NOT punitive in nature for which the Real Party in Interest, Regents of the University of California, would have had immunity. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
(Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Dkt No 14-981, cert granted June 29, 2015). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
At another level, such lawsuits (which are usually class actions) almost never articulate any credible basis that the plaintiffs suffered any actual harm.In Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 1:12 pm
The new proposed rule (if passed) does not explicitly state whether posting a notice would be sufficient, so please stay tuned for updates. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Regents of University of California, 47 Cal.3d 376, 392 (1988), the court stated, "An EIR, when looked at as a whole, must provide a reasonable, good faith disclosure and analysis of the project's environmental impacts. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 11:56 am
Regents of University of California, 47 Cal.3d 376, 392 (1988), the court stated, "An EIR, when looked at as a whole, must provide a reasonable, good faith disclosure and analysis of the project's environmental impacts. [read post]
