Search for: "Doe v. Trump et al" Results 161 - 180 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2018, 6:45 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
United States Department of Health and Human Services et al., in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (No.1:16-cv-00878). [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by SHG
It is, without a doubt, a feather in the law school’s cap to keep producing Supreme Court justices, and yet these students, et al., are “ashamed”? [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm by David Greene
The law that was ultimately passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump was actually the most egregiously bad of those Congress had been considering. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
This hypothetical may not capture the true facts of the Trump presidency. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 10:40 am by Chinmayi Sharma
Trump Jr., son of President Trump and considered a close political adviser to the campaign, who was in the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting; Paul J. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by SHG
While Cohen, et al., have not yet had jeopardy attach by plea or the start of trial, such that New York’s double jeopardy statute would kick in, any conduct in question has already been committed. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 11:50 am by William Ford
In light of Zuckerberg’s admission during congressional testimony that the company has a responsibility to use its tools for good, and his acknowledgement that “terrorist propaganda” constitutes “clearly bad activity,” the attorney seeks an order voiding Garaufis’s prior decision and reviving the case—Force et al. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:18 am by Eric Goldman
Innovation * NY Times: Russia Wants Innovation, but It’s Arresting Its Innovators * Contigiani et al, Trade Secrets and Innovation: Evidence from the ‘Inevitable Disclosure’ Doctrine. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am by Richard Hunt
J.U.T.A., Inc. et al,  6:17-CV-987ORL40KRS, 2018 WL 1305909 (M.D. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
As a consequence of this shift, the limitation on interest deductibility is anticipated to raise significantly more federal revenue after 2021 than it does initially. [read post]