Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive"
Results 161 - 180
of 4,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Whether the criteria of exclusion is intersectional in nature, i.e. defined by another characteristic like age does not perforce justify that criteria as non-discriminatory upon any reasonable interpretation of Article 15(1).[16]Similarly, the argument that permission to enter other temples justifies denial of entry at Sabarimala is tantamount to saying that discrimination is not discrimination when made selectively. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
* Does Size Matter? [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
The OECD has outlined the potential for GILTI to be deemed an approved income inclusion rule under Pillar 2. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 1:48 pm
Numbers (1), (2) and (7), quoted supra (Insurance Law, sec. 600), are not in issue in this case, none of them having been asserted--one way of the other--by either of the parties. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:25 pm
So how does section 1036 change this? [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The impugned decision does not state that any further ground for opposition prejudiced the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:09 am
The impugned decision does not state that any further ground for opposition prejudiced the maintenance of the patent as granted. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
The plurality decision in that case pointed to differences between the language in Sections 4(a)(1) and 4(a)(2) of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to support its conclusion that disparate impact claims are cognizable under Section 4(a)(2) — namely that Section 4(a)(2) focuses on practices that “otherwise adversely affect” persons because of age. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 6:01 am
Nor does the treaty expand the president’s war power. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
In a 6-2 opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court held in Gobeille that ERISA Section 514 preempts Vermont’s requirement that health insurers and other health benefit payers report health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for inclusion in an all-inclusive health care data base. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:27 am
LBers, does the definition fit? [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 1:39 pm
Pillsbury SALT is proud to announce its inclusion in the Chambers USA 2020 Guide. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:08 am
Saying that a tail is a leg does not make it a leg. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:09 pm
§ 1658(b) sets the statute of limitations for federal securities fraud claims as the shorter of: (1) two years after discovery of the facts constituting the violation; or (2) five years after such violation. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:13 am
How much of a difference does it make, to those of us in the bottom 99%, how equally or unequally spouses in the top, say, 1% or .1% or .01% "share" their income or wealth? [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
————————————————— [1] UK P&I Club Circular October 2015 [2] www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/workshop/wks_capbld/unedocs_summary.pdf [3] Motis Exports [2000] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 211 [4] http://www.essdocs.com/edocs/electronic-bills-of-lading [5] Glencore v MSC [2015] EWHC 1989 (Comm) [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
————————————————— [1] UK P&I Club Circular October 2015 [2] www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trade/workshop/wks_capbld/unedocs_summary.pdf [3] Motis Exports [2000] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 211 [4] http://www.essdocs.com/edocs/electronic-bills-of-lading [5] Glencore v MSC [2015] EWHC 1989 (Comm) [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The “endogenous” harm standard is both under-inclusive and over-inclusive. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
Accordingly, § 1292(c)(2) does not extend to contempt orders. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:00 am
² Effective January 15, 2015, a new subsection 1 was added to section 408.040; nevertheless, the subsections pertaining to nontort and tort actions remained unchanged and were merely renumbered to become what are now subsections 2 and 3. [read post]
