Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Disciplinary Actions and Penalties applicable to public officers and employees of New York State and its political subdivisions The excerpts below are from The Discipline Book1 An electronic guide to disciplinary actions involving public officers and employees in New York State. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
(3) Score one for consistency: Justice Alito’s test for when officers can remove a objector to trigger the usual common authority test of United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
United States, — U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
See Traffic Rules and Regulations of the City of Boston art. 4, § 1(6) (2003). [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 6:19 am
Kazakhstan also commenced an action against the unnamed Does in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking injunctive relief and damages.On March 4, 2015, Kazakhstan initiated this limited action in King County Superior Court. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:10 pm
The court in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:21 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
” In order to fall within this category of cases, a federal issue must be “(1) necessarily raised, (2) actually disputed, (3) substantial, and (4) capable of resolution in federal court without disrupting the federal-state balance approved by Congress. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am
A: The President does not have the power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 8:30 pm
Houck, No. 1:10-cv-01962-HHK, in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
The President Is Not an "Officer of the United States" Nor Does He Hold an "Office under the United States" a. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
On December 4, 2007, the mortgage was filed in the office of the Franklin County Recorder, absent notary acknowledgement. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
What the Office of Medicaid has done is distort the case of Doherty v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 10:21 am
While courts generally hold that "[a]n attorney's inadvertence, neglect, mistake or misplaced reliance does not constitute good cause for the purposes of the Rule 4(m)," see, e.g., Howard v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 11:46 am
Regardless of whether you are dealing with Federal or State laws, the United States and the Insurance Carriers are entitled to receive recovery based on the applicable law. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:39 pm
Budai v. [read post]
