Search for: "Does 1-88"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
This is an appeal against the rejection of the opposition against the patent under consideration.Claim 1 as granted read:1. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Code § 1028(a)(1), and false attestation in an immigration matter in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
Google, Inc., 802 F.3d 979, 987–88 (9th Cir. 2015)). [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
Does this indicate that the drawing is to scale? [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
It follows that features (d), (f), (g) and (h) are not technical features of the claimed liquid formulation in the sense of R 29(1) and decision G 2/88. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am
The main issue in this correction was the addition of "or less" after "0,25 microns" in claim 1. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 10:46 am
Such analysis does not logically apply to user in possession prosecutions. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
By extension then, a Volkswagen beetle limousine with 88 humps, does not look the same, does not function the same, and is, in fact, not the same, as a Volkswagen beetle with 1 hump because they do not share identical Automotive DNA. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
By extension then, a Volkswagen beetle limousine with 88 humps, does not look the same, does not function the same, and is, in fact, not the same, as a Volkswagen beetle with 1 hump because they do not share identical Automotive DNA. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
These effects are more like those in T 158/88 and T 603/89 than in T 26/86. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 6:40 pm
However, if a person does not get proper medical treatment the wound can extend into the muscle, tendon and the bone. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 1:52 pm
Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
How does it compare historically to other recoveries? [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 11:01 am
The Boards of Appeal have developed a substantial body of case law relying on the principle of good faith to be applied in the procedures before the EPO and which implies that measures taken by the EPO shall not violate the reasonable expectations of parties to such proceedings (G 5/88, G 7/88 and G 8/88, OJ EPO 1991, 137). [2.3.2] The protection of this principle requires that the user of the European patent system, here the patent proprietor in opposition appeal… [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
When does it run out? [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
However, as was emphasized by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in decision G 1/88, OJ EPO 1989, 189, Reasons 2.4, surrender of a right cannot be simply presumed (a jure nemo recedere praesumitur; see also T 685/98, OJ EPO 1999, 346, Reasons 3.3). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:16 am
However, as was emphasized by the Enlarged Board of Appeal in decision G 1/88, OJ EPO 1989, 189, Reasons 2.4, surrender of a right cannot be simply presumed (a jure nemo recedere praesumitur; see also T 685/98, OJ EPO 1999, 346, Reasons 3.3). [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
The application was refused because claim 1 did not fulfil the requirements of A 84 and A 123(2) EPC. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:02 am
There are specific criteria which need to be met, but once met this system allows a more just compensation. [1] 38 CFR 3.321(b)(1). [2] Johnston v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 10:02 am
There are specific criteria which need to be met, but once met this system allows a more just compensation. [1] 38 CFR 3.321(b)(1). [2] Johnston v. [read post]
